Manual testing provided as a service billed per hour or per task/project.

If you are still using Excel for your test cases (and many teams do), this is the best tool for test cass management – QAComplete.

Companies Evaluating TestComplete but Still Undecided
Teams who’ve trialed or evaluated TestComplete but remain unconvinced, I can offer a deeper, more tailored proof of concept. This would include:
Working test examples for core actions and workflows
A sample sanity test plan
Hands-on collaboration with SmartBear Support to address decision-blocking issues (e.g., handling custom controls, integrating API calls, backend interaction, or toolchain integration, etc)
I’ll work directly with their manual and automation testers to ensure a practical evaluation. This process typically takes a few weeks but results in a clearer understanding of TestComplete’s real-world fit.

Companies That Tried TestComplete but Disengaged
In my experience, many teams give up on automation too early — often blaming the tool when issues stem from other sources (human and technical), such as:
Choosing the wrong automation approach, poor design for maintainability and integration in CI/CD process
Inconsistent object recognition strategies (very common), hardcoded values, lack of shared functions, or improper use of variables and wait methods, etc
These are common implementation challenges, not tool limitations. I specialize in helping such teams reboot their efforts with a stronger foundation and strategy.

Teams Looking to Modernize Their Automation
Many teams fall behind on automation as their applications evolve. Whether due to skipped upgrades or a lack of dedicated resources, they often find their scripts outdated or broken.
In these cases, bringing in a consultant to refactor or modernize their setup can be more efficient than asking internal testers to catch up. I can help stabilize and relaunch their automation using the latest TestComplete capabilities

First of all, you cannot compare Postman to ReadyAPI. Many argue that Postman is “free” – well, it’s not. And it has way less features

While automation testing offers numerous advantages, it may not be suitable for all projects. Projects with rapidly changing requirements or small-scale applications may benefit more from manual testing. A thorough analysis is essential to determine the best approach for each specific project.

TBA